Sunday, February 14, 2016

UAVs

     There are different ways that civilians can make use of UAVs. Some people use UAVs to take pictures or videos of the things they are doing or the sights they are seeing. Other people use them for fun and just like to fly the UAV. Other ways that UAVs have been used are for hurricane hunting, helping protect wildlife, and even search and rescue. “Drones can charge into the heart of a storm without risking human life and limb. That's one reason NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and Northrop Grumman teamed up on a three-year, $30 million experiment to use long-range Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) to spy on storms as they evolve” (Handwerk, 2013). This is to help study hurricanes more and come up with some data to try to help predict the powers that hurricanes can and will have. For the wildlife protection, they help with keeping track of certain wildlife and their population using UAV which is a lot less in cost and it save times. They figure out where these animals live and can try to protect those areas from being destroyed so these wildlife species can have a home. For search and rescue, UAV can be used to help locate people who may be missing a lot faster and more efficient. “An injured victim of an automobile accident in Saskatchewan, Canada, in May 2013 may have been the first person to have his life saved by a search-and-rescue drone. A Dragan Flyer X4-ES drone with heat-sensing equipment, launched by the Mounties, found the victim before a potentially fatal night outdoors in subfreezing temperatures” (Handwerk, 2013). This was used because they could not find this person after using people on the ground and a helicopter that was using night vision. These UAVs can help cover more ground in a lot less time, but it would help to make sure whoever is flying the UAV is someone who knows how to fly one and knows the area pretty well. There are several other ways that UAVs are being used for civilian purposes. “Potential drove applications are unlimited, from law enforcement, to agriculture, construction, and infrastructure inspection. In Europe, the use of drones is increasing for several civilian purposes, including traffic management, crop monitoring, and news reporting” (Paganini, 2015).

     The FAA has proposed some regulations that people who want to use UAVs for civilian use would have to follow. “Operators can fly drones that weigh less than 55 pounds, beneath an altitude of 500 feet, outside of flight paths, not near airports and not faster than 100 mph. Most importantly, the operator has to keep their drone within line of sight” (Tucker, 2015). In addition to these, those who want to operate an UAV would have to be seventeen years or older and receive an operator certificate. For those that would like to use drones for photography, the FAA has thought about having separate rules for smaller UAVs. “The FAA has said that the agency is open to slightly different rules for micro-UAVs, drones beneath 4.4 pounds, which would allow for even greater use of drones for photography potentially beyond line of sight” (Tucker, 2015). This could increase the use of UAVs if it makes it easier for people to use these for photography reasons.

     I do see UAVs integrating into the NAS because it has become such a popular topic and I feel as if there are too many people who want to use them that the FAA cannot stop them, so they might as well try to regulate them. I think that there will be people who will be using them for business purposes such as agriculture or law enforcement or even just for personal use to take pictures or videos. I think that this could be beneficial for some businesses, but there needs to be some type of way to make sure these businesses are using them for good reasons. A lot of the issues that come into play with the UAV are the security and privacy of people or misuse especially after the UAV that crashed onto the White House property. “The principal issues that need to be urgently addressed are flight authorization, privacy and data protection control, liability, and insurance” (Paganini, 2015).  I do think these are issues that need to be addressed as soon as possible because this is for the safety of not only those who operate the UAVs, but the companies they may work for or the community itself. A big problem is that there will probably be a lot of people who may use these drones for reasons they shouldn’t or may be someone who may not know how to properly use one and causes damage to something or can get in trouble for not following regulations.

     The military has a variety of UAVs that serve a wide range of purposes. “They range from large vehicles that can carry offensive weapons to a miniature system whose components are light and compact enough to be carried in a Marine’s backpack” (Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), n.d.). These UAV help the military with “security, search and rescue, monitoring, impact and disaster management, communications, and munition” (Military UAS Applications, 2016). These UAVs help all the branches of the military because they provide ways to keep humans out of dangerous situations. There are different types of UAVs that are produced to fulfill certain needs especially in the military. Some UAVs are really small which makes it harder for other people such as the enemy to notice them. These UAVs that are used in mission are smaller and cost less money than using aircraft. If something were to happen to the UAV, it would cost less money to replace or repair than it would for an aircraft. It also would do less damage than an aircraft would if something were to go wrong and it crashes. It also wouldn’t have any humans on board during these missions, so people wouldn’t be getting killed trying to get information on other people. UAVs “provide troops with a 24-hour ‘eye in the sky,’ seven days a week. Each aircraft can stay aloft for up to 17 hours at a time, loitering over an area and sending back real-time imagery of activities on the ground” (Drones: What Are They And How Do They Work?, 2012). This can help benefit the military in many ways and protect people from actually having to do these dangerous missions.

     I did a search for UAV civilian jobs and there were a lot of jobs that came up that ranged from pilots to instructors to a systems specialist on Indeed.com. (http://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=Uav+Operator&start=10) One that seemed really interesting was the UAV Systems Specialist. Part of the responsibilities are “responsible for researching, analyzing, developing and documenting detailed requirements for operator, maintenance, and troubleshooting procedures, checklists, technical specifications, alert bulletins, training materials and other procedures and reports” (UAV Systems Specialist, 2016). I think that with the use of UAVs expanding, there will be many more jobs that come with this. There will be people that work in making sure that people are following regulations, people who need to take action for those that do not follow the rules, and people to issue any certification that may be required. There could also be a need for pilots for certain companies and people to train these pilots properly.


References

Drones: What Are They And How Do They Work? (2012, January 31). Retrieved from BBC News: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-10713898
Handwerk, B. (2013, December 2). 5 Surprising Drone Uses (Besides Amazon Delivery. Retrieved from National Geographic: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/12/131202-drone-uav-uas-amazon-octocopter-bezos-science-aircraft-unmanned-robot/
Military UAS Applications. (2016). Retrieved from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems Association : https://www.uavs.org/military
Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). (n.d.). Retrieved from Smithsonian National AIr and Space Museum : https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/uav/
Paganini, P. (2015, March 31). Why Civilian Drone Use Is A Risky Business. Retrieved from Fox News: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/03/31/why-civilian-drone-use-is-risky-business.html
Tucker, P. (2015, February 15). Here Come the Drones: FAA Announces Civilian Rules. Retrieved from Defense One: http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2015/02/here-come-drones-faa-announces-civilian-rules/105375/
UAV Systems Specialist. (2016, February 2). Retrieved from General Atomic and Affiliated Companies: https://www.ga-careers.com/job/-/-/499/1405502?apstr=%26codes%3DIIND



Tuesday, February 9, 2016

The Cargo Industry

     As a result of the Colgan Air accident, the FAA made new flight and duty regulations that changed the amount of flight time a pilot has, their duty period, and the amount of rest they have to get based on many different factors. The difference between the new regulations and the old regulations is that the old regulations “included different rest requirements for domestic, international and unscheduled flights.  Those differences were not necessarily consistent across different types of passenger flights, and did not take into account factors such as start time and time zone crossings” (Duquette & Sachse, 2011). The new regulations base these times off of what time of the day that the pilots are flying, how many flight segments they have, and if they are crossing time zones, how many do they cross. Pilots are allowed anywhere from 9 to 14 hours for their flight duty depending on what time of day their day begins and how many segments they have to fly. Pilots are only allowed to have a flight time of eight to nine hours. Not only that, but pilots need to have at least ten hours of rest period which adds two more hours from the old regulations, but the pilots need to be able to get uninterrupted eight hours of sleep. The new regulations also changed the amount of allowed flight duty time a pilot can have in a week and on within twenty-eight days. They implemented these regulations to try to limit the amount of fatigue that pilots have to try to prevent accidents from occurring.

     The current flight and duty limitations for cargo carriers are different than the commercial pilots. The cargo carriers were left out of the new regulations when it came to changing the amount of hours needed for duty time and resting time. “Cargo pilots fly under older rules that do not require as must rest, permit longer times on duty and allow them to fly beyond eight hours in certain conditions. And those rules do not impose any special limits on flight time at night, when cargo carriers do much of their flying” (Carroll, 2014). Part of the big issue of flying at night is that our body usually relates night time as a time where we should be sleeping and it can be really hard to get on a sleeping pattern where you are up at night and sleeping during the day. As cargo pilots who do a lot of flying during the nighttime, people see this as an issue because they feel like they are more likely to become fatigued easier.

     Cargo carriers were at first included in the new regulations, but once the final rule came out, they were excluded. “Cargo pilots were included when the regulations were originally proposed by the FAA, but the White House ordered the agency to remove them. The idea that and ‘exemption’ providing all-cargo carriers to ‘opt in – or – out’ of this new rule fails to meet the mandate of ‘One Level of Safety’” (One Level of Safety, n.d.). I think a lot of the reason that the cargo carriers are not included in the new changes is because of how much it will cost the cargo carriers. “Covering cargo operators under the new rule would be too costly compared to the benefits generated in this portion of the industry” (Duquette & Sachse, 2011). I think that even though it might cost a lot to implement this system for cargo carriers, there are still costs to pilots being fatigued that are greater than money. Even though there are less people on board, if accidents do occur because of pilot fatigue, this is a far greater cost because people can become injured or die and damage can be done to the aircraft. If pilots become more and more fatigued, the chances of accidents occurring becomes greater. I think there could be some way to make regulations for cargo carriers that can help them get more rest and prevent fatigue that doesn’t cost them as much as these regulations.

     I believe that cargo carriers should be included in the new rules. Yes, it may be really expensive, but it is also expensive when accidents occur. Maybe the overall benefits of implementing a system that allows for safer travels for cargo operations will lower the chances of accidents which can then save lives of not only the pilots, but those that live in areas where potential accidents can occur or anyone else that is flying in the sky. Cargo pilots are still humans and they do get tired. Flying at night time is a lot harder than flying during the day due to our circadian rhythm. We relate night time to sleeping and it can be very hard to get out of that habit of sleeping at night. Another hard thing that affects someone while flying is crossing many time zones. It affects our bodies a lot when we are constantly changing time zones. “These types of operations, particularly nighttime flying and around-the world operations, are the norm for all-cargo carriers. Cargo pilots are routinely operating aircraft under the most fatigue inducing conditions and are not afforded the protection of scientifically based duty and rest regulations” (One Level of Safety, n.d.). This is a big deal because as cargo carriers who are flying during the worst hours of any given day, it can take effect on your body and slowly start to make staying awake harder. This can impair the pilots’ thinking which can lead to poor decisions or longer response time. Another reason why they should be included in these regulations is because of the effect it can have on other people. Although they may not have as many people on board as a commercial aircraft would, they could still have loss of life. Every life is important even if the number of people is smaller. Cargo pilots still fly in the same sky as commercial pilots, so if they crash, this can affect the surrounding area, those on board and their families, and their company.
    
     As management, if cargo carriers were included in these new rules, I think that management would really have to figure out how to schedule their employees. They would probably need to hire more pilots in order to fill any gaps that will occur if pilots need a certain amount of rest period and have limitations on flight duty time. I do think this could help bring in more pilots though because people would possibly be more interested in flying cargo if they had limitations on these issues. Pilots wouldn’t feel constantly fatigued and this could help possibly draw in some more pilots. I do think this could help management in some ways because it can prevent all the hassle the comes with violations or accidents due to pilot fatigue. It can spare them the time and money that come with these situations. Another way it can potentially help is by keeping the pilots healthy. This could help them stay in good shape and health so they don’t become ill and need to take time off of work or even call off right before their flight because they are too tired and cannot fly.   

References

Carroll, J. R. (2014, March 13). UPS Pilots Urge More Rest For Cargo Crews. Retrieved from USA Today : http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/13/ups-pilots-urge-more-rest-for-cargo-crews/6402615/
Duquette, A., & Sachse, B. N. (2011, December 21). Press Release – FAA Issues Final Rule on Pilot Fatigue. Retrieved from Federal Aviation Administration: https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=13272
One Level of Safety. (n.d.). Retrieved from The Coalition of Airline PIlots Associations: http://www.capapilots.org/cargocarveout